OBJECTIVES: The in vitro pharmacodynamics of silver(I) and silver(II) complexes of a polydiguanide ligand, chlorhexidine, were assayed to examine the value of the bactericidal endpoint as an alternative means of evaluating their antibacterial activities against burn wound pathogens. METHODS: Synthesis of silver(I) chlorhexidine [Ag(I)CHX] was accomplished by in situ precipitation of the complex from a feebly acidic or neutral aqueous solution of AgNO(3) and chlorhexidine, whereas silver(II) chlorhexidine [Ag(II)CHX] was synthesized by oxidation of Ag(I), followed by complexation of the oxidized metal with chlorhexidine. Their antibacterial potencies were assessed in vitro by determining the MICs and MBCs for four Gram-positive and four Gram-negative bacteria. Time-kill assays using three different concentrations of these agents were also performed. RESULTS: The MICs of Ag(I)CHX and Ag(II)CHX were much lower than those of chlorhexidine, AgNO(3) and silver sulfadiazine. The time-kill study provided quantitative information on actual times required to reach the bactericidal endpoint using a particular concentration of the active agent. The lethality rates of Ag(I)CHX and Ag(II)CHX against the tested bacteria were 2× to 8× faster than those of chlorhexidine or AgNO(3) at a concentration equal to or 4× MIC. CONCLUSIONS: Ag(I)CHX and Ag(II)CHX showed superior antibacterial activity and faster killing kinetics compared with chlorhexidine and AgNO(3). These complexes may serve as new-generation antibacterial agents in wound care.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pal et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: