Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) has emerged as a promising intervention for reducing surgical site infections (SSIs) across various surgical disciplines, particularly in high-risk abdominal and gastrointestinal surgeries. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the efficacy of NPWT in preventing SSIs and improving postoperative outcomes in such procedures. A comprehensive literature search was conducted across PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library, identifying 641 studies, of which 10 high-quality randomized controlled trials (RCTs) met the inclusion criteria. Studies included a range of abdominal procedures, including emergency laparotomies, colorectal cancer surgeries, and hepatopancreatobiliary interventions. Findings indicated that NPWT significantly reduced SSI rates in high-risk populations, particularly in contaminated and emergency abdominal surgeries, with reductions in seroma formation and wound dehiscence also observed. However, some studies reported no significant benefits in lower-risk procedures, highlighting the importance of appropriate patient selection. Quality assessment revealed moderate-to-high methodological quality, though common limitations included open-label designs and sample size variability. The results support the targeted use of NPWT in high-risk abdominal surgeries, though further large-scale, multicenter trials are needed to refine patient selection criteria and optimize clinical application.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bastawisy et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: