The authors examine the premium consequences of alternative health insurance provisions by estimating pricing regressions for group insurance with data on 9, 019 fee-for-service plans offered by larger firms in the private sector. They find that cost-sharing at the point of purchase, especially for hospital care, significantly lowers fee-for-service premiums. However, some aspects of plan design that are often touted as cost-reducing, such as self-insuring or offering employees the option to join a health maintenance organization, are found to increase premiums. Coverage of alcoholism/chemical dependency treatments, inpatient mental health care, and psychologists' services, which are mandated in many states, are found to be expensive.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jensen et al. (1990) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: