Nitrogen (N) supply needs to be closely matched to crop demand to achieve optimum N use efficiency (NUE). Sub‐optimal N supply can lead to poor yields, whereas excess N application may cause nitrate leaching and environmental pollution. An experiment with five rates of N: 0, 25, 50, 100 and 200 kg ha −1 , was carried out at Lincoln, Canterbury, in New Zealand to define the effects of N supply on growth, N uptake and define how derived NUE may influence nutritive value of fodder beet production. Both dry matter (DM) yield and N uptake increased with N supply, by 39% and 129%, respectively, when 200 kg N ha −1 was applied, compared with the control plots. Leaf area index (LAI) also increased with N supply. However, the control crop did not attain critical LAI (LAI crit ) and those receiving 25 and 50 kg N ha −1 attained LAI crit for only a short period of time compared with crops supplied with ≥100 kg N ha −1 . This meant that they intercepted less radiation and subsequently had lower DM yield than the high N treatments. The specific leaf nitrogen increased 13% to 2.34 g N m −2 leaf when ≥50 kg N ha −1 was applied, compared with the control plots. The NUE decreased by 64% from 93 kg DM kg −1 N for the 25 kg N ha −1 plots compared with the 200 kg N ha −1 plots. Nitrogen rate had no effect on the nutritive value of fodder beet. The results suggest 100 kg N ha −1 was adequate for optimum DM production and N was important for canopy development and subsequent DM accumulation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chakwizira et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: