Recently, a comprehensive clinical balance test, the balance evaluation systems test (BESTest), was developed to identify the postural control systems causing balance impairments. A short version, the mini-BESTest, was thereafter developed by eliminating redundant and insensitive items. This study aimed to translate the mini-BESTest to Swedish, adapt it and investigate its validity in subjects with Parkinson's disease (PD) or stroke. The Mini-BESTest was translated and back-translated in accordance with Guillemin's guidelines. Discrepancies were discussed and solved by a panel and the test was culturally adapted. Concurrent validity of the final version was explored by correlating well-known clinical tests - the Berg Balance Scale (BBS), the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test and the Falls Efficacy Scale (FES(s)) - with the new mini-BESTest in nine subjects with mild-to-moderate PD (60 years, range 46-85) and nine with chronic stroke (78 years, range 66-90). A high-to-very-high correlation was shown between the mini-BESTest and the BBS (PD: r(s) =0.94, stroke: r(s) =0.86). The mini-BESTest correlated highly with the TUG (PD: r(s) = -0.81, stroke: r(s) = -0.89). In the PD group, a low correlation (r(s) =0.26) was seen between the mini-BESTest and the FES(s). The mini-BESTest has high concurrent validity and is a comprehensive assessment of balance. However, its psychometric properties should be evaluated further.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bergström et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: