Why the study?
High failure rates and repeat visits for oral sedation leave pediatric dental patients waiting for definitive operating room treatment, prompting evaluation of an in-office general anesthesia program.
Does in-office general anesthesia improve case completions and complete radiographs compared to oral sedation in pediatric dental patients?
Does in-office general anesthesia improve case completions and complete radiographs compared to oral sedation in pediatric dental patients?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In-office general anesthesia for pediatric dental care significantly improves case completion and radiograph acquisition rates compared to oral sedation, with a low rate of adverse events.
Tertiary pediatric medical centers disproportionately care for low-income, underserved children with significant dental needs. Long wait times for hospital operating room treatment increase tooth loss rather than restoration. Oral sedation has commonly been provided to avoid the long waits for operating room treatment. However, this can be challenging with young, anxious patients. High failure rates and repeat visits for oral sedation have resulted in continued waiting for definitive dental services in the operating room. The Division of Dentistry requested the Department of Anesthesiology to create a general anesthesia program in the dental clinic to increase the use of anesthesia services but align the cost of the anesthetic with the revenue stream. Our aim was to objectively measure the performance of a dental clinic anesthesia service by comparing the percentage of case completions, percentage of complete radiographs, and number of serious adverse events to clinic-based oral sedations. We were also interested in total number of cases completed. We retrospectively studied data regarding an in-office general anesthesia (IOGA) program for dentistry and compared it to oral sedations before and after instituting the IOGA program. Patients received either a general endotracheal anesthetic or nonintubated total intravenous general anesthesia. Successful case completion increased from 88.6% (oral sedation) to 99.5% (IOGA). One hundred percent of IOGA cases had complete radiographs, as opposed to 63.4% for oral sedation. This was an increase from 53.5% from the previous 2 years with oral sedation. Serious adverse event rate was 0% (0/508) for oral sedation and 0.2% (1/418) for IOGA. Comparing 2 years before and after IOGA revealed a decrease in oral sedations from 930 to 508, whereas IOGA increased from 0 to 418 cases. Anesthesia services in dental clinic increased complete dental care and complete radiographs, reduced failed sedations, and were performed safely.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Moore et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: