Why the study?
Does verapamil control chronic idiopathic idioventricular tachycardia?
Does verapamil control chronic idiopathic idioventricular tachycardia?
Verapamil successfully controlled chronic idiopathic idioventricular tachycardia that was unresponsive to fast channel blockers, digoxin, and amiodarone, suggesting a slow response automaticity mechanism.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Verapamil may control refractory idiopathic IVT; hypothesis-generating for calcium channel blockade in this rare arrhythmia.
A 22-year-old female, asymptomatic and without any evidence of cardiac disease, was found to have a persistent idioventricular tachycardia (IVT). Sinus rhythm and IVT rates were similar and showed parallel changes in successive resting electrocardiograms. Both IVT and sinus rhythm were transiently slowed or suppressed by vagal stimulation and accelerated by sympathetic stimulation. Long periods of atrial overdrive pacing, at a rate 62% faster than the spontaneous rate of IVT, depressed both ectopic and sinus activity. Fast channel blocking agents (lidocaine, disopyramide), and digoxin and amiodarone failed to modify IVT significantly. Verapamil, a calcium channel blocking drug, allowed total control of the arrhythmia. These electrophysiologic and pharmacologic responses suggest that the IVT may relate to the automatic activity of a ventricular focus of the "slow response" type, functionally resembling an "additional" sinus node with preserved innervation. During an 88-month follow-up, the patient continued to be asymptomatic, warning arrhythmias were never found and the features of IVT remained unmodified.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chiale et al. (1987) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: