Why the study?
Does echo-derived peak cardiac power output-to-left ventricular mass (CPOM) combined with CPET predict outcomes in patients with chronic heart failure and depressed systolic function?
Does echo-derived peak cardiac power output-to-left ventricular mass (CPOM) combined with CPET predict outcomes in patients with chronic heart failure and depressed systolic function?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Peak cardiac power output-to-mass (CPOM) combined with CPET provides incremental prognostic value over standard clinical and echocardiographic variables in patients with chronic heart failure.
Background: Peak cardiac power output-to-mass (CPOM) represents a measure of the rate at which cardiac work is delivered with respect to the potential energy stored in left ventricle (LV) mass. Aim: To investigate the value of peak CPOM and cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) in risk stratification of patients with chronic heart failure (HF). Materials and methods: We studied 137 patients with chronic HF (mean LV ejection fraction 30%) undergoing CPET and exercise stress echocardiography. CPOM was calculated as the product of a constant (K=2.22 × 10–1) with cardiac output (CO) and the mean arterial pressure (MAP), divided by LV mass (M), and expressed in the unit of W/100 g: CPOM = [K × CO (l/min) × MAP (mmHg)]/M (g). Patients were followed-up for the primary end-point, that included all-cause death and VAD implantation and the composite end-point that comprised hospitalization for HF. Results: In multivariate Cox regression analyses, peak COPM was selected as the most powerful independent predictor of the end points (HR: 0.043, 95% CI: 0.004–0.044, p=0.008; HR: 0.011, 95% CI: 0.02–0.66, p=0.016). Five-year survival free from all-cause death or VAD implantation was 92% in those exhibiting VO2 >14 ml/min/kg and peak COPM >0.6 W/100 g (Fig. 1). Peak VO2 ≤14 ml/min/kg provided incremental prognostic value over demographic and clinical variables, BNP and resting echocardiographic parameters (chi-square: from 34.2 to 46.1; p=0.005), that was further increased by peak COPM ≤0.6 W/100 g (chi square: 52.2; p=0.026).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pugliese et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: