Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The experimental seismic responses of a full-scale two-story light-frame wood townhouse building, designed to modern U.S. engineered seismic design requirements, were compared against the predictions of a new software package entitled seismic analysis package for woodframe structures (SAPWood) developed recently within the NEESWood Project. The main objective of this paper was to verify the accuracy of the predictions from the SAPWood model, which incorporates shear deformations of shear walls as well as cumulative floor displacements caused by the out-of-plane rotations of the floor and ceiling diaphragms. A comparison was conducted on interstory drifts and shear wall deformations for various structural configurations (construction phases) of the test building and excitation levels. Good agreement was found between the numerical predictions and test results for the four different construction phases. The SAPWood model was shown to be a promising numerical tool for predicting the seismic response of light-frame wood structures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lindt et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: