Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This study examined the role of naturally occurring anti-idiotypic antibody (anti-id), specific for epitopes on antibodies to schistosome egg antigens (SEA), in serosuppression during Schistosoma japonicum infection. Three anti-id preparations were obtained from pools of infected serum at 12, 16, and 30 wk of infection. Anti-id (12 wk) bound 36% of labeled anti-SEA antibodies, had an idiotype binding capacity (IBC) of 5 micrograms/ml, and did not suppress SEA-induced proliferation. Anti-id (16 wk) bound 17% of labeled anti-SEA antibodies, had 29 micrograms IBC/ml, and reduced 3H incorporation from 21.4 +/- 0.5 (10 micrograms/ml normal Ig) to 9.1 +/- 1.5 X 10(4) cpm (P less than 0.01). Anti-id (30 wk) bound 66% of labeled anti-SEA antibody, had 84 micrograms IBC/ml, and suppressed 3H incorporation by 88% (4.8 +/- 0.3 X 10(4) cpm, P less than 0.001). Analysis of the serologic reactivity of these three populations of anti-idiotypic antibodies revealed that anti-id (12 wk) described an idiotypic population of anti-SEA molecules containing a minor cross-reactive idiotype (SJ-CRIm). In contrast, anti-id (30 wk) described a serologically distinct, idiotypic population containing a major cross-reactive idiotype of anti-SEA molecules (SJ-CRIM). A monoclonal anti-id, which reacted with greater than 50% of the anti-SEA molecules describing SJ-CRIM, was profoundly suppressive in vitro and reduced granulomatous inflammation around parasite eggs in vivo from 113 X 10(3) micron2 to 23 X 10(3) micron2 (80% suppression, P less than 0.001). These observations suggest that immune network interactions modulate inflammation in chronic murine S. japonicum infection.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Olds et al. (1985) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: