Why the study?
Loss of consciousness during football games has very high mortality, prompting the need to identify independent survival factors and evaluate FIFA emergency initiatives.
Does the implementation of FIFA medical emergency initiatives improve survival after loss of consciousness in football players?
Does the implementation of FIFA medical emergency initiatives improve survival after loss of consciousness in football players?
The implementation of FIFA medical emergency initiatives in 2013 significantly improved survival rates for football players experiencing loss of consciousness on the pitch.
Survival factors after pitch LOC need clarification; leaves open FIFA program efficacy.
Loss of consciousness (LOC) during football games is associated with very high mortality rates. In order to address football medical emergencies, in 2013 FIFA implemented the "FIFA 11 steps to prevent sudden cardiac death" program and distributed the FIFA Medical Emergency Bag. The purpose of this work was to identify independent survival factors after LOC on the pitch and to investigate the effectiveness of the FIFA initiatives. An internet search was performed to identify football players suffering LOC on the pitch between 1990 and 2021. A total of 268 cases could be identified and were dichotomized according to the implementation date of the FIFA medical emergency bag. There was 55% mortality after LOC, while cardiogenic LOC was more often (82% vs. 20%) fatal than traumatic LOC. Mortality in developing countries was higher than in developed countries. From the year 2013 survival improved significantly for both traumatic and cardiogenic cases. The location of the LOC significantly influenced survival (OR: 0.20 and p<0.001). LOC on the football field is associated with increased mortality and requires separate monitoring based on a traumatic vs. non-traumatic cause. FIFA initiatives significantly reduced mortality after LOC but significant differences were identified between developed and developing countries.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Katsigiannis et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: