Why the study?
Surgery is the best curative option for gastric cancer, but morbimortality remains significant, making preoperative surgical risk determination essential to optimize outcomes.
Do surgical risk scales (POSSUM and P-POSSUM) accurately predict postoperative morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing curative gastrectomy for gastric cancer?
Do surgical risk scales (POSSUM and P-POSSUM) accurately predict postoperative morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing curative gastrectomy for gastric cancer?
POSSUM and P-POSSUM surgical risk scales show good calibration and discrimination for predicting postoperative morbidity and mortality in gastric cancer patients undergoing curative gastrectomy.
May aid preoperative risk assessment in gastrectomy; leaves open optimal scale selection pending validation.
Abstract: (1) Background: Surgery is the best curative option for Gastric Cancer (GC). However, morbimortality associated with surgery still a significant problem. Thus, it is essential to determine the preoperative surgical risk, to optimize outcomes in higher risk patients. (2) Methods: Patients who underwent curative gastrectomy between January 2010 and December 2013 were included, obtaining a sample of 131 patients, and the acuity of the scales understudy was evaluated. The predictive power of the scales was evaluated through calibration and discrimination. (3) Results and Conclusions: Regarding mortality, the scales demonstrated good calibration, with POSSUM and P-POSSUM obtaining the best O:E ratio. The scales presented good discrimination, with POSSUM showing the best result. Considering morbidity, the scales showed good calibration and discrimination. POSSUM and P-POSSUM seem to have potential in predicting morbidity and mortality when applied to the studied population, but there is a need for further studies in this area.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pereira et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: