Why the study?
Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death in CKD, and kidney-produced arginine bioavailability contributes to endothelial and myocardial dysfunction in CKD.
Does arginase inhibition improve myocardial dysfunction in a mouse model of chronic kidney disease?
Does arginase inhibition improve myocardial dysfunction in a mouse model of chronic kidney disease?
Arginine dysregulation correlates with myocardial dysfunction in CKD, and arginase inhibition may improve ventricular strain in preclinical models.
Altered arginine metabolism may underlie cardiac dysfunction in CKD; leaves open whether pathway-targeted therapies improve outcomes.
Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death in chronic kidney disease (CKD). Arginine, the endogenous precursor for nitric oxide synthesis, is produced in the kidneys. Arginine bioavailability contributes to endothelial and myocardial dysfunction in CKD. Plasma from 129X1/SvJ mice with and without CKD (5/6th nephrectomy), and banked plasma from children with and without CKD were analyzed for amino acids involved in arginine metabolism, ADMA, and arginase activity. Echocardiographic measures of myocardial function were compared with plasma analytes. In a separate experiment, a non-specific arginase inhibitor was administered to mice with and without CKD. Plasma citrulline and glutamine concentrations correlated with multiple measures of myocardial dysfunction. Plasma arginase activity was significantly increased in CKD mice at 16 weeks vs. 8 weeks (p = 0.002) and ventricular strain improved after arginase inhibition in mice with CKD (p = 0.03). In children on dialysis, arginase activity was significantly increased vs. healthy controls (p = 0.04). Increasing ADMA correlated with increasing RWT in children with CKD (r = 0.54; p = 0.003). In a mouse model, and children, with CKD, arginine dysregulation correlates with myocardial dysfunction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Reyes et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: