Why the study?
Does psychomotor ability testing and human reliability analysis improve operative competence and safety in surgical practice?
Does psychomotor ability testing and human reliability analysis improve operative competence and safety in surgical practice?
Psychomotor ability testing and human reliability analysis are emerging methodologies for selecting surgical trainees and ensuring safe operative practices.
May inform trainee selection and safety monitoring; hypothesis-generating pending prospective validation in surgical practice.
This review deals with the methodology that exists for assessing the intrinsic or innate abilities required for acquisition of the necessary skills with training so that operative competence and proficiency are reached by surgical trainees at the end of the training programme. In addition, it covers human reliability analysis (HRA) as a technique (long-used in high-risk industries) for ensuring safe execution of operations and a good clinical outcome. Both subjects are relatively new in surgery and most of the account is based on work carried out at Dundee University of Dundee Department of Surgery and Molecular Oncology and Surgical Skills Unit over a 10-year period. The methodology for both is still relatively crude but, nonetheless, progress has been made. In surgery the important role of psychomotor ability testing is in the selection of and the assessment of progress of trainees during the surgical residency. HRA applies both to surgical trainees when good habits and practice become ingrained and during the entire working career of consultant surgeons.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
G. B. Hanna A. Cuschieri (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: