Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVE: To assess whether there is evidence that the surgeon is a prognostic factor in the treatment of colorectal cancer. DATA SOURCE: MEDLINE 1985-February 1999, and bibliographies of retrieved articles. STUDY SELECTION: Publications which analysed the outcome of patients with colorectal cancer and in which one of the variables analysed was the surgeon. RESULTS: Thirteen studies were identified which addressed the outcome measures: post-operative mortality, anastomotic leak rate, local recurrence rate, and long-term survival. For these outcomes, different surgeons achieve significantly different results, with experienced and specialist surgeons achieving significantly better results than other surgeons. CONCLUSION: The current data strongly suggest that the surgeon is an important prognostic factor in the treatment of colorectal cancer.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alan P. Meagher (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: