The influence of the molecular geometry of corresponding differently branched nonionic surfactants on surface and micellar properties in aqueous solution was investigated by surface tension measurements. The nonionic surfactants with a branched hydrophilic moiety are described as Y surfactants (C n G(E m /2 M) 2 ) and with a branched lipophilic moiety as V surfactants: symmetrical V s (C n /2 ) 2 GE m M and asymmetrical V a (C k )(C n - k )GE m M; where C n and C k denote an alkyl chain, G a triglyceryl unit, and E m M an oligo(oxyethylene) monomethyl ether with k = 4, n = 10, 12, 14, 16, and m = 6, 8, 10. The critical micelle concentration (cmc), the standard free energy of micellization (Δ G m ), the equilibrium surface tension (γ cmc ), and areas per molecule at cmc ( A cmc ) at the air−water interface were determined as a function of the total hydrocarbon number ( n ) m =const in the lipophilic part and oxyethylene group number ( m ) n =const, in the hydrophilic part of the surfactant. The results are discussed on the basis of structural factors for the corresponding Y, V s, V a surfactants and compared with data of the conventional unbranched surfactants C n E 8 M (I surfactants). Within these homologous series the increase of ( n ) m leads to the lowering and an increase of ( m ) n to the increasing of the cmc's and Δ G m 's. For the corresponding surfactant series the negative contribution to the cmc and Δ G m of each CH 2 group promotes micellization and increases in the sequence I > Y > V s . On the other hand the positive contribution of each EO group opposes the micellization and is larger for Y than for V s surfactants. The γ cmc and A cmc for Y surfactants are significantly larger than for V surfacants. In the gorup of the V surfactants the cohesive forces of the hydrocarbon chains significantly influence the γ cmc 's.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kratzat et al. (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: