Why the study?
The study aimed to objectively describe physical activity, sedentary behavior, and cardiorespiratory fitness in adolescents with congenital heart disease, and evaluate potential gender differences and moderating effects related to Theory of Planned Behavior elements.
Adolescent CHD survivors, particularly females, demonstrate low levels of physical activity and high perceived barriers, highlighting the need for targeted, support-based interventions.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Gender-tailored counseling may address lower MVPA and fitness in female adolescents with CHD; leaves open whether Theory of Planned Behavior interventions improve outcomes.
OBJECTIVE: The current study aimed to (a) describe moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA), sedentary behavior (SB), and cardiorespiratory fitness (VO2Peak) via objective assessment among adolescents with congenital heart disease (CHD), (b) examine gender differences on MVPA, SB, VO2Peak, and the Theory of Planned Behavior elements, and (c) identify whether gender moderates the relationships between the Theory of Planned Behavior elements and MVPA, SB, and VO2Peak. METHODS: Adolescent CHD survivors (N = 86; ages 15-18 years) wore an accelerometer to assess MVPA and SB, underwent an exercise stress test to assess VO2Peak, and completed a survey of the Theory of Planned Behavior elements as measured by perceived benefits (attitudes), family/friend support and perceived norms (social norms), and self-efficacy and barriers (perceived behavioral control) to engaging in physical activity. RESULTS: On average, CHD survivors engaged in 22.3 min (SD = 15.3) of MVPA/day and 9 hr of SB/day (M = 565.8, SD = 102.5 min). Females engaged in less MVPA but not more SB had a lower mean VO2Peak, reported lower self-efficacy, and perceived greater barriers than males. In a regression model, barriers explained unique variance in MVPA and VO2Peak, but the relationship between barriers and MVPA/VO2Peak did not vary by gender. Self-efficacy did not explain unique variance in MVPA and VO2Peak when included in a model with gender and barriers. CONCLUSIONS: Family/friend support for physical activity engagement may be an important consideration when developing physical activity interventions for adolescent CHD survivors. The role of gender differences in self-efficacy and perceived barriers on physical activity engagement warrants further investigation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jackson et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: