Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Phase II trials are often designed with an interim analysis so they can be stopped early if a drug is ineffective. One problem with interim analyses is incomplete follow-up for some patients. Standard designs such as Simon (1989) require suspension of accrual until patient follow-up is completed. Case and Morgan (2003) proposed a two-stage design for a Phase II oncology trial with a long-term endpoint that does not suspend accrual when the interim analysis is conducted. We review the Case and Morgan design and propose modifications to ensure protection of Type I error rate and improved robustness to nonoptimal conditions likely to be encountered in practice. Software (an R package) is described to create the optimal designs and easily simulate their properties to check asymptotic approximations and the robustness of the performance of the designs in operational conditions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Huang et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: