Why the study?
Does two-dimensional echocardiography with contrast improve the visualization of ventricular septal defects and assessment of hemodynamic status compared to M-mode echocardiography in infants?
Does two-dimensional echocardiography with contrast improve the visualization of ventricular septal defects and assessment of hemodynamic status compared to M-mode echocardiography in infants?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Two-dimensional echocardiography with peripheral contrast is superior to M-mode for visualizing ventricular septal defects and estimating hemodynamic severity in infants.
Twenty-seven patients with ventricular septal defect (VSD), ages 2 months to 2 years, were evaluated by both M-mode and two-dimensional echocardiography (2-D echo) with the aid of a peripheral venous contrast technique. M-mode echocardiography was unreliable for imaging VSD. Using 2-D echo, defects in the interventricular septum were visualized in all patients examined; defects in the membranous portion (24 patients) were visualized by the subcostal frontal approach and defects in the supracristal portion (three patients) by the subcostal sagittal approach. The 2-D echo contrast study revealed negative contrast jets appearing through the defect in the right ventricle in 22 patients with a pulmonary-to-systemic blood flow ratio greater than 2.0, and positive contrast jets appearing through the defect in the left ventricle in 13 patients with a right-to-left ventricular peak pressure ratio greater than 0.71. We conclude that 2-D echo with peripheral contrast technique confirmed the anatomic location of VSD and indicated the approximate right-to-left ventricular peak pressure ratio, showing the contrast material shunting through the defect itself.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Funabashi et al. (1981) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: