A 2-(v,k,λ) block design (P,B) is additive if, up to isomorphism, P can be represented as a subset of a commutative group (G,+) in such a way that the k elements of each block in B sum up to zero in G. If, for some suitable G, the embedding of P in G is also such that, conversely, any zero-sum k-subset of P is a block in B, then (P,B) is said to be strongly additive. In this paper we exhibit the very first examples of additive 2-designs that are not strongly additive, thereby settling an open problem posed in 2019. Our main counterexample is a resolvable 2-(16,4,2) design (F4×F4,B2), which decomposes into two disjoint isomorphic copies of the affine plane of order four. An essential part of our construction is a (cyclic) decomposition of the point-plane design of AG(4,2) into seven disjoint isomorphic copies of the affine plane of order four. This produces, in addition, a solution to Kirkman's schoolgirl problem.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Marco Pavone (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: