Experimental carbon–proton coupling constants are reported for 36 monosubstituted allenes, 20 ethenes and 5 butatrienes. The data for the allenes cover a range of substituents in which either the first atom of the substituent (all Group IV–VII elements of the second and third row are covered) and/or the substitution of that atom is varied. The electronegativity (σ I ) of the substituent directly attached to the coupled carbon atom is correlated with the 1 J (CH) coupling. This is also borne out by the good correlations between 1 J (CH) values in the allenes and 1 J (CH) values in various other classes of chemical compounds. Theoretically calculated 1 J (CH) values correctly reflect the substituent effects on the experimental values in the allenes, ethenes and butatrienes spearately, but fail to give a satisfactory description of the differences in 1 J (CH) for these types of compounds. In disubstituted allens and ethenes the substituent effects on 1 J (CH) values are additive. The experimental and calculated values differ by less than 1 Hz. Two‐ and three‐bond carbon–proton couplings are also discussed in terms of electronegativity, substituent and hybridization effects and mutual relationships. Large values, up to 6 Hz, are found for 4 J (CH) and 5 J (CH) in the allenes and butatrienes. These large values are ascribed to σ‐π interactions. For geometrically equivalent couplings a constant ratio of n J (CH)/ n J (HH) is found in the ethenes (0.65; n = 3) and in the allenes and butatrienes (0.55; n = 4 and 5, respectively). 1 J (CH) and 3 J (CH) coupling constants are used for the conformational analyses of vinyl, allenyl and butatrienyl ethers and thioethers. At room temperature the methyl and ethyl ethers are predominantly in an s ‐ cis conformation, whereas the iso‐propyl allenyl ether is a mixture of s ‐ cis and s ‐ trans ; the tert ‐butyl allenyl ether exists mainly in the s ‐ trans conformation. The thioethers are all in the s ‐ cis conformation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Koole et al. (1984) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: