Why the study?
The study investigated the potential of model-based extended Kalman filtering for continuous hemodynamic monitoring during hemorrhage resuscitation and sedation.
Does model-based extended Kalman filtering (EKF) improve the accuracy of estimating cardiac output and total peripheral resistance compared to open-loop prediction or PCCO in virtual patients undergoing hemorrhage resuscitation and sedation?
Does model-based extended Kalman filtering (EKF) improve the accuracy of estimating cardiac output and total peripheral resistance compared to open-loop prediction or PCCO in virtual patients undergoing hemorrhage resuscitation and sedation?
Model-based extended Kalman filtering can accurately estimate cardiac output and total peripheral resistance from mean arterial pressure without requiring waveform data, accounting for sedative drug effects.
EKF may aid continuous monitoring in complex resuscitation; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before clinical use.
This letter investigates the potential of model-based extended Kalman filtering (EKF) for hemodynamic monitoring in a hemorrhage resuscitation-sedation case study. To the best of our knowledge, it may be the first model-based state estimation study conducted in the context of hemodynamic monitoring. Built upon a grey-box mathematical model with parametric uncertainty as process noise, the EKF can estimate cardiac output (CO) and total peripheral resistance (TPR) continuously from mean arterial pressure (AP) measurements against inter-individual physiological and pharmacological variability. Its unique practical strengths include: it does not require AP waveform as in existing AP-based pulse-contour CO (PCCO) monitors; and it can estimate CO and TPR with explicit account for the effect of sedative drugs. The efficacy of the EKF-based hemodynamic monitoring was evaluated based on a large number of plausible virtual patients generated using a collective inference algorithm, which demonstrated that it has significant advantage over open-loop pure prediction, and that its accuracy is comparable to PCCO.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yin et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: