Key result
PEGylated fibrin patch enhances mesenchymal stem cell viability and induces endothelial-like differentiation in vitro.
A potential therapy for myocardial infarction is to deliver isolated mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) to the infarcted site. A key issue with this technology is the development of a suitable system for MSC delivery. Our delivery system of interest is a fibrin-based patch used to entrap cells during polymerization. This delivery vehicle has many advantages; however the mechanical properties and the limited capacity for tailoring cell response may restrict its application. We have developed a PEGylated fibrin patch for MSC transplantation by modifying fibrinogen (Fgn) with the benzotriazole carbonate derivative of PEG to create secondary crosslinking. In this study, the chemical PEGylation of fibrinogen was verified by both amine group quantification and SDS-PAGE. The clotting characteristics and physical properties were compared between the fibrin patch and PEGylated fibrin patch. After seeding with porcine MSCs, the cell viability, morphology, and motility in the novel patch were observed. Phenotypic changes in the embedded MSCs were examined using immunohistochemistry and RT-PCR. The optimal molar ratio (PEG:Fgn = 10:1) was determined for loading MSCs in vitro into the PEGylated fibrin patch. The results suggest that our PEGylated fibrin patch increases MSC viability. Furthermore, the PEGylated fibrin causes phenotypic changes in MSCs consistent with endothelial cells.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2006) studied Myocardial infarction (in vitro porcine mesenchymal stem cell model). PEGylated fibrin patch vs. Unmodified fibrin patch was evaluated on MSC viability, morphology, motility, and endothelial phenotypic differentiation. A PEGylated fibrin patch (optimal 10:1 PEG:fibrinogen molar ratio) increased porcine mesenchymal stem cell viability in vitro and induced endothelial-like phenotypic changes.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: