Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Provides an educational overview of antithrombotic therapy and conservative management strategies for patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes.
### Learning objectives Upon completion of this module, the reader will be able to: Non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE-ACS) comprise unstable angina and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). Among patients admitted for myocardial infarction (MI), nearly two times more were hospitalised for NSTEMI as compared with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) in a recent community-based registry.1 In the French Registry of Acute Coronary Syndrome (FAST) MI registry, only 20% of patients presenting with NSTEMI were managed conservatively, and 75% of these were aged ≥75 years. Patients with NSTEMI also had significantly more cardiovascular (CV) complications than those with STEMI.2 Moreover, medically managed patients with NSTE-ACS are at increased risk for recurrent events as compared with patients who undergo revascularisation as shown in clinical trials and national registries.3–5 Current NSTE-ACS guidelines recommend an assessment of ischaemic and bleeding risk using validated risk assessment methods to decide on pharmacological and invasive management.6 Ischaemic events continue to occur over time after NSTE-ACS, possibly because patients with NSTE-ACS are older and have more comorbidities than patients with STEMI. Therefore, NSTE-ACS treatment strategies must equally address the acute phase as well as long-term management. Some of the major goals of conservative strategy (CS) in NSTE-ACS are angina relief, improvement in myocardial perfusion, prevention of thrombus propagation, stabilisation of vulnerable plaque and reduction of long-term recurrent …
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gurbel et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: