Perceived Differences Between the Genium and the C-Leg Microprocessor Prosthetic Knees in Prosthetic-Related Function and Quality of Life

Microprocessor knees (MPKs) are a viable option for persons with transfemoral amputation (TFA). Studies have assessed biomechanics and physical function to quantify MPK functional performance. However, it is also essential to assess patient perception as part of evidence-based practice using valid and reliable measures. The Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire (PEQ) evaluates prosthetic-related function and quality of life. The PEQ has been used in MPK literature to compare perceptive response between C-Leg and non-microprocessor-controlled knee mechanisms. The Genium, a new MPK, has not been assessed for differences in perceived function. The purpose of this project was to report perceived differences in prosthetic function and quality of life following accommodation with a Genium compared with a C-Leg. Twenty people with TFA participated in this randomized crossover study. C-Leg users randomized to test first with their own C-Leg or a Genium then crossed over into the other condition for repeated testing. Nonknee prosthetic attributes were held constant. Participants completed the PEQ for each knee condition to compare perceived differences in prosthetic function and quality of life. Genium use resulted in significant improvements (p ≤ 0.05) in the following scales — Perceived Response, Social Burden, Utility, and WellBeing — as well as in individual items related to improved standing comfort, satisfaction with walking ability, and improved gait in tight spaces, hills, and slippery surfaces (p < 0.025). As a result of using the Genium, patients perceive improvements in prosthetic-related quality of life and function. Further, patients perceive improvements in very specific mobility functions related to ambulation on complex settings.