Why the study?
Do endothelin-receptor antagonists improve outcomes in patients with pulmonary artery hypertension?
Do endothelin-receptor antagonists improve outcomes in patients with pulmonary artery hypertension?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Endothelin receptor antagonists like bosentan and ambrisentan are effective and have a major role in the treatment algorithm for pulmonary artery hypertension, though they require monitoring for liver function and edema.
AIMS: The demonstration that endothelin production is upregulated in pulmonary artery hypertension (PAH) served as the rationale for developing endothelin-receptor antagonists (ERAs) as a treatment for PAH. This article reviews the primary studies demonstrating efficacy of ERAs in PAH. MAIN METHODS: Multicenter, placebo-controlled trials and open-label extension studies. KEY FINDINGS: Two orally active ERAs are currently approved for the treatment of PAH - the dual receptor antagonist bosentan, and the more selective ET(A) receptor antagonist ambrisentan-based on multicenter randomized clinical trials demonstrating efficacy and safety. Long-term experience with both agents supports maintenance of therapeutic effects in most patients. Adverse effects, including altered liver function and edema may occur and require careful monitoring. SIGNIFICANCE: Despite failure to demonstrate efficacy of ERAs in other cardiopulmonary conditions, ERAs have a major role in the treatment algorithm for PAH.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lewis J. Rubin (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: