Hydrodynamical equations for the probability density {ρ} and the local velocity v of a non-Markovian stochastic process have been recently obtained. The corresponding complex equation in terms of the wave function {ψ} coincides with the Schr\"odinger equation if the first-order terms only are retained. The second-order terms vanish and the third-order terms could be considered as QED-type corrections. To obtain the coefficient D₄ of the third-order term the probability density {ρ} for a free particle is obtained by stochastic electrodynamics. This solution is substituted in the new complex equation, thus obtaining D₄. By this coefficient the calculation of the Lyman-{α} wavelength is in agreement with the best direct measurements for the transition 2P{→}1S. The 1S displacement is 1% of the QED value for the Lamb shift. It is suggested how the new negative contribution could be the difference between the (1+0.01) QED value for the 3S state and the corresponding experimental value, which is 20% less than that given by QED.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cavalleri et al. (1991) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: