Why the study?
Does pseudohomozygosity for APC resistance increase the risk of venous thromboembolism compared to normal subjects or heterozygous FV Leiden carriers?
Does pseudohomozygosity for APC resistance increase the risk of venous thromboembolism compared to normal subjects or heterozygous FV Leiden carriers?
Pseudohomozygosity for APC resistance significantly increases the risk of venous thromboembolism compared to normal subjects, but the risk is similar to that of heterozygous FV Leiden carriers.
May warrant similar VTE risk stratification to heterozygous FV Leiden; observational data leave open need for prospective validation.
Pseudohomozygosity for activated protein C resistance (APC-r) is a rare condition due to the association of heterozygous FV Leiden mutation and partial type I FV deficiency. To assess the risk of venous thromboembolism in these subjects, seven families including 11 pseudohomozygotes and 45 relatives were examined. Among the relatives, 16 were heterozygous FV Leiden carriers, nine showed partial FV deficiency and 20 no abnormalities. Deep vein thrombosis occurred in 4/11 (36.3%) pseudohomozygous patients versus 6/16 (37. 4%) FV Leiden carriers and 1/20 (5%) normal relatives. Pseudohomozygotes and FV Leiden carriers had a significantly increased risk of venous thrombosis in comparison to normal relatives (RR 8.8 and 5.7, respectively). There was no difference between the thrombotic risk of pseudohomozygous subjects and of FV Leiden carriers (RR 1.6, 95% CI 0.43-5.7). Furthermore, there was no difference in thrombosis-free survival between pseudohomozygotes and 45 consecutive FV Leiden heterozygous outpatients, suggesting that a referral bias may explain the apparent younger age of thrombosis in the pseudohomozygotes in comparison to relatives with FV Leiden heterozygosity (27 years v 54 years; P = 0.01). Pseudohomozygosity for APC resistance carries a significantly higher risk for venous thromboembolism in comparison to normal subjects, but probably not in comparison to heterozygous FV Leiden carriers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Castaman et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: