Why the study?
Does endorectal ultrasonography with color flow and pulse wave Doppler differentiate normal rectal wall from rectal masses based on vascular structures?
Does endorectal ultrasonography with color flow and pulse wave Doppler differentiate normal rectal wall from rectal masses based on vascular structures?
Endorectal color and duplex ultrasonography can differentiate normal rectal wall from rectal cancers based on vascular resistance and color signal intensity.
May support vascular differentiation of rectal masses on endorectal Doppler; leaves open prospective validation before clinical adoption.
This study investigates the ability of endorectal ultrasonography aided by color flow and pulse wave Doppler techniques to identify submucosal arterial plexuses of the normal rectal wall and to detect vessels supplying rectal wall masses. Color flow and pulsed wave Doppler analysis of 62 normal submucosal arterial plexuses and vessels feeding rectal wall masses (one rectal endometriosis and seven rectal cancers) was performed. The color signals from normal submucosal arterial plexuses and the one case of rectal endometriosis were judged to be sparse or decreased in comparison to color signals from rectal cancers. The median and mean P1 values for normal submucosal arterial plexuses were significantly greater than those for the central feeding vessels or small peripheral vessels within rectal masses. Our experience with color and duplex endorectal ultrasonography suggests that different vascular structures exist in normal persons compared to those in rectal wall masses. Pathologically, rectal cancers possess vessels with and without a smooth muscle layer, which may produce the high and low resistance signals identified by pulse Doppler.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alexander et al. (1994) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: