Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
October 3, 2012EJNMMI ResearchOpen Access

Assessment of tumour size in PET/CT lung cancer studies: PET- and CT-based methods compared to pathology

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

PCPatsuree CheebsumonRBRonald BoellaardDRDirk De Ruysscher

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Cite This Study

Cheebsumon et al. (2012) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a70fe6753da1ffdb507b1f2https://doi.org/10.1186/2191-219x-2-56
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Effects of Image Characteristics on Performance of Tumor Delineation Methods: A Test–Retest Assessment2011 · 66 citations
  2. 2Impact of Tumor Size and Tracer Uptake Heterogeneity in <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET and CT Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer Tumor Delineation2011 · 139 citations
  3. 3A novel iterative method for lesion delineation and volumetric quantification with FDG PET2007 · 113 citations
  4. 4Measurement of metabolic tumor volume: static versus dynamic FDG scans2011 · 29 citations