Why the study?
Recent technological advancements have introduced diverse radar types, hardware implementations, and signal processing algorithms for vital signs detection, warranting a review of the state-of-the-art literature over the recent five years.
Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Comparison
Radar processing platforms using FPGAs vs other processing platforms
Design
Literature review
Radar vital signs detection advances non-contact monitoring options; leaves open clinical validation and spectrum coexistence with communications.
This paper presents a survey of the state-of-the-art advances in human vital signs detection using radar sensors, their integration and coexistence with communication systems, and their issues in spectrum sharing. The focus of this survey is to review the detection, monitoring, and tracking of vital signs, specifically the respiration rate and heartbeat rate over the recent five years. It is observed that in line with technological advancements, a multitude of radar types operating in diverse frequency spectra have been introduced with different hardware implementations, considering various detection scenarios, and applying multiple signal processing algorithms. The aim of these researches varies, from enhancing the detection accuracy, improving the processing speed, reducing the power consumption, simplifying the hardware used, lowering implementation costs, and the combinations of them. Besides that, this review also focuses on literature aimed at increasing the detection accuracy and reducing the processing time using FPGAs, prior to benchmarking them against other processing platforms. Finally, a perspective on the future of human vital signs detection using radar sensors concludes this review.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Obadi et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: