Why the study?
Despite internal fixation preserving the hip joint in young femoral neck fracture patients, complications and poor clinical outcomes frequently lead to diminished function and health-related quality of life.
Does surgical fixation type (cancellous screws vs. SHS) and vitamin D supplementation improve patient-reported function and HRQL in young patients with femoral neck fractures?
Does surgical fixation type (cancellous screws vs. SHS) and vitamin D supplementation improve patient-reported function and HRQL in young patients with femoral neck fractures?
In young patients with femoral neck fractures, neither implant type nor vitamin D supplementation significantly improved patient-reported function or HRQL at 12 months.
Supports pilot feasibility of alternative fixation strategies; leaves open definitive efficacy trials in young femoral neck fracture patients.
PURPOSE: Femoral neck fractures in young patients are typically managed with internal fixation using either cancellous screws or a sliding hip screw (SHS). Although fixation preserves the hip joint, patients are still at risk of complications and poor clinical outcomes which lead to diminished function and health related quality of life (HRQL). The Fixation using Alternative Implants for the Treatment of Hip Fractures (FAITH-2) pilot randomized controlled factorial trial evaluated the effect of surgical fixation (cancellous screws vs. SHS) and vitamin D supplementation vs. placebo on patient-reported function and HRQL. METHODS: 4,000 IU or placebo daily for 6 months. Patient-reported function (Hip Outcome Score) and HRQL (Short Form-12) were assessed at standardized time points in the 12 months following their fixation surgery. Patient-reported function and HRQL were summarized using means, SD, and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), or percentages and counts. Longitudinal data analysis with mixed models was used to explore the effect of treatment group and time on the patient-reported function and HRQL. RESULTS: 86 of the 91 patients randomized into the FAITH-2 pilot study were deemed eligible. There were no significant differences in patient-reported function or HRQL between the treatment groups at 12 months post-fracture. At the 6- and 9-month assessments, a potential benefit in hip function was seen in the cancellous screw group. In all treatment groups, participants reported lower function and HRQL at 12 months post-fracture as compared to their pre-injury assessment. CONCLUSIONS: Few differences were found in function and HRQL among the treatment groups in the FAITH-2 pilot study. Despite modern implants and vitamin D supplementation, neither function nor HRQL returns to baseline in this population. Additional efforts to improve the outcomes of these challenging injuries are still needed. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level II.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Slobogean et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: