Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
It is known that angiotensin II (Ang II) exerts an antifibrinolytic effect by stimulating synthesis of plasminogen activator inhibitor type-1 (PAI-1), a specific inhibitor of tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA). The aim of this study was to compare the antithrombotic potency of imidapril, an angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor, and candesartan, an angiotensin II type 1 (AT1) receptor antagonist, in a model of arterial thrombosis in spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHRs). Oral treatment with 5 mg/kg imidapril 1 h before induction of thrombosis resulted in a significant reduction in thrombus weight, whereas candesartan did not affect thrombus weight under the same treatment conditions. Candesartan lowered blood pressure to the same degree as in the imidapril-treated rats. Imidapril not only reduce the serum and aortic ACE activities, but also reduced aortic PAI-1 protein levels, while candesartan had no effect on theses. These results suggest that imidapril, but not the AT1 receptor antagonist, candesartan, enhances fibrinolysis via a reduction of aortic PAI-1 levels by inhibiting ACE and prevents thrombus formation in SHRs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mitsui et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: