Randomized trial demonstrates dose-proportional pharmacokinetics and favorable safety of peficitinib in healthy Chinese adults, indicating predictable exposure with minimal accumulation.
Objective: To investigate the pharmacokinetics and safety of peficitinib (Janus kinase inhibitor for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis) in healthy Chinese subjects following single and multiple doses. Methods: This open-label, randomized study was conducted at one site in China. Subjects received peficitinib 50, 100 or 150 mg as a single dose on Day 1 (fasted) and once daily from Days 8 to 13 in the multiple-dose period (fed). Blood samples were collected before administration each day, and up to 72h post administration. Pharmacokinetic assessments included area under the concentration curve (AUC), half-life (t 1/2 ), maximum concentration (C max ), and time to maximum concentration (t max ) of peficitinib and its metabolites (H1, H2 and H4). Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were evaluated. Results: Thirty-six subjects were enrolled (12 per dose group). After a single dose of peficitinib, median t max was 1.0– 1.5h and mean t 1/2 was 7.4– 13.0h for all doses. In the multiple-dose period, median t max was 1.5– 2.0h. Dose-proportional increases in C max and AUC 24h were observed for peficitinib and its metabolites following single and multiple doses, with minimal drug accumulation. The major metabolite was H2, with a systemic exposure of > 150% of the parent AUC. Drug-related TEAEs were experienced by 5 (13.9%) and 12 (33.3%) subjects in the single- and multiple-dose periods, respectively. Following multiple doses of peficitinib, TEAEs were more frequent in higher than lower dose groups but were mild in severity with no related discontinuation or death. Conclusion: Following single and multiple doses of peficitinib in healthy Chinese subjects, peficitinib demonstrated rapid absorption and was well tolerated at all doses. Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT04143477.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gao et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: