Key result
ABC-CHD risk model strongly predicts cardiovascular death with a 0.81 c-index.
Why the study?
There is no generally accepted model to predict outcomes in patients with stable coronary heart disease.
Does the ABC-CHD risk model accurately predict cardiovascular mortality in patients with stable coronary heart disease?
Cohort (n=14,711)
Does the ABC-CHD risk model accurately predict cardiovascular mortality in patients with stable coronary heart disease?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A simple clinical prediction model combining age, three biomarkers (NT-proBNP, hs-cTnT, LDL-C), and three clinical variables accurately predicts cardiovascular mortality in stable coronary heart disease.
BACKGROUND: Currently, there is no generally accepted model to predict outcomes in stable coronary heart disease (CHD). OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated and compared the prognostic value of biomarkers and clinical variables to develop a biomarker-based prediction model in patients with stable CHD. METHODS: In a prospective, randomized trial cohort of 13,164 patients with stable CHD, we analyzed several candidate biomarkers and clinical variables and used multivariable Cox regression to develop a clinical prediction model based on the most important markers. The primary outcome was cardiovascular (CV) death, but model performance was also explored for other key outcomes. It was internally bootstrap validated, and externally validated in 1,547 patients in another study. RESULTS: During a median follow-up of 3.7 years, there were 591 cases of CV death. The 3 most important biomarkers were N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT), and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, where NT-proBNP and hs-cTnT had greater prognostic value than any other biomarker or clinical variable. The final prediction model included age (A), biomarkers (B) (NT-proBNP, hs-cTnT, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol), and clinical variables (C) (smoking, diabetes mellitus, and peripheral arterial disease). This "ABC-CHD" model had high discriminatory ability for CV death (c-index 0.81 in derivation cohort, 0.78 in validation cohort), with adequate calibration in both cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: This model provided a robust tool for the prediction of CV death in patients with stable CHD. As it is based on a small number of readily available biomarkers and clinical factors, it can be widely employed to complement clinical assessment and guide management based on CV risk. (The Stabilization of Atherosclerotic Plaque by Initiation of Darapladib Therapy Trial [STABILITY]; NCT00799903).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lindholm et al. (2017) conducted a cohort in stable coronary heart disease (CHD) (n=14,711). ABC-CHD risk model was evaluated on cardiovascular (CV) death (c-index 0.81). The ABC-CHD risk model, incorporating age, biomarkers, and clinical variables, demonstrated high discriminatory ability for cardiovascular death with a c-index of 0.81 in the derivation cohort.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: