Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A new group of 1-phenylpyrazolo[3,4-d]pyrimidine derivatives 14a–d–21 were synthesized from 2-(6-methyl-1-phenyl-1H-pyrazolo[3,4-d]pyrimidin-4-yloxy)acetohydrazide (12). All the synthesized compounds were evaluated for their cyclooxygenase (COX) inhibition, anti-inflammatory activity and ulcerogenic liability. All the target compounds were more potential in inhibiting COX-2 than COX-1. Compounds having pyrazolyl moiety in a hybrid structure with pyrazolo[3,4-d]pyrimidine scaffold (14a–d, 16 and 17) showed higher edema inhibition percentage activities (34–68%) and the 5-aminopyrazole derivative (14c, ED50 = 87.9 μmol/kg) was the most potent one > celecoxib (ED50 = 91.9 μmol/kg). While, the in vivo potent compounds (14a–d, 16, 17 and 21) caused variable ulceration effect (ulcer index = 0.33–4.0) comparable to that of celecoxib (ulcer index = 0.33), the pyrazol-3-one derivative (16) and the acetohydrazide (21) were the least ulcerogenic derivatives showing the same ulcerogenic potential of celecoxib.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bakr et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: