Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This study investigates the ways in which middle school teachers in the USA develop academic language in intermediate‐level English learners who attend mainstream content classes. Analysis of field notes, transcripts, and student work show that (a) academic language and higher‐order thinking skills are closely linked, and (b) classroom discourse patterns and activities both develop and impede language growth. The teachers used four principle communication strategies: questioning, gestures, connecting to background knowledge with examples and analogies, and personifying. The results suggest that students, despite growth in certain dimensions of cognition and language, also learn counter‐productive “rules of school”. This research is intended to benefit the millions of ‘non‐mainstream’ students worldwide who struggle in schools that have been created and shaped to serve mainstream purposes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jeff Zwiers (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: