Key result
Medicare Part D linked to a ~16-point narrower Hispanic-White CV adherence gap, but widened Black-White disparities.
Observational (n=17,677)
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Medicare Part D improved medication adherence among the elderly, but to date, its effect on disparities in adherence remains unknown. We estimated Part D impact on racial/ethnic disparities in adherence to cardiovascular medications among seniors, using pooled data from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (2002-2010) on 14,221 Medicare recipients (65+ years) and 3,456 near-elderly controls (60-64 years). Study sample included White, Black, or Hispanic respondents who used at least one cardiovascular medication. Twelve-month adherence was measured as having an overall proportion of days covered ≥80%. Adherence disparities were defined according to the Institute of Medicine framework. Using difference-in-differences logistic regression, we found Part D to be associated with a 16-percentage-point decrease in the White-Hispanic disparity in overall adherence among seniors, net of the change among controls. Black-White disparities worsened only among men, by 21 percentage points. Increasing access and improving quality of medication use among disadvantaged seniors should remain a policy priority.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hussein et al. (2015) conducted an observational in Cardiovascular disease requiring medication (n=17,677). Medicare Part D implementation vs. Near-elderly controls (60-64 years) was evaluated on Racial/ethnic disparities in 12-month adherence to cardiovascular medications (proportion of days covered ≥80%) (16-percentage-point decrease in White-Hispanic disparity; 21-percentage-point increase in Black-White disparity among men). Medicare Part D was associated with a 16-percentage-point reduction in White-Hispanic cardiovascular medication adherence disparities, while Black-White disparities worsened by 21 percentage points in men.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: