Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND: To investigate the expression and significance of c-kit and epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) molecules (E-cadherin, N-cadherin, Twist, Snail) in thymic epithelial tumors (TETs). METHODS: The tissue microarray technology and immunohistochemistry MaxVisionTM-use kit were used to detect the expression of c-kit and EMT molecular markers in 150 cases of paraffin sections of TET tissue and analysis the correlation between c-kit and EMT molecules and explore the malignancy and the relationship of clinicopathological parameters between c-kit, EMT molecules and TETs. RESULTS: The expression difference of c-kit and EMT molecular markers (E-cadherin, N-cadherin, Snail, Twist) in TETs subtypes was statistically significant (P<0.01) and their positive expression rate of thymic carcinoma was significantly higher than that in thymoma, and the difference was statistically significant, respectively (P<0.01). There is a negative correlation between the expression of c-kit and E-cadherin as well as a positive correlation between the expression level of c-kit, N-cadherin, Twist, and Snail. Furthermore, E-cadherin was negatively correlated with N-cadherin, Twist, and Snail while N-cadherin expression was positively correlated with Twist, Snail. CONCLUSIONS: Five indicators (c-kit, E-cadherin, N-cadherin, Twist, and Snail) may determine the malignancy of TETs, especially for distinguishing thymoma and thymic carcinoma.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wu et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: