Repeated hypoxic cycle exercise over a 2-week period does not elicit a training response and shows low day-to-day variability in cardiorespiratory measures.
No training response or variability in repeated hypoxic exercise supports short-term protocol reliability; leaves open clinical translation pending randomized data.
Repeatedly performing exercise in hypoxia could elicit an independent training response and become an unintended co-intervention. The primary purposes of this study were to determine if hypoxic exercise responses changed across repeated testing and to assess the day-to-day variability of commonly used measures of cardiorespiratory and metabolic responses to hypoxic exercise. Healthy young males (aged 23 ± 2 years) with a maximal O2 consumption of 50.7 ± 4.7 mL·kg(-1)·min(-1) performed 5 trials (H1 to H5) over a 2-week period in hypoxia (fraction of inspired oxygen = 0.13). Participants completed 3-min stages at 20%, 40%, 60%, and 10% of individual peak power. With increasing cycle exercise intensity there were increases in minute ventilation, O2 consumption, CO2 production, respiratory exchange ratio, heart rate (HR), blood lactate concentration, and ratings of perceived exertion for legs and respiratory system along with a reduction in oxyhaemoglobin saturation (%SpO2) (all p < 0.001). There were no systematic changes from H1 to H5 (p > 0.05). Most measures were highly repeatable across testing sessions with the coefficient of variation (CV) averaging ≤10% of the mean value in all variables except O2 consumption (17%), CO2 production (11%) and blood lactate concentration (17%). For HR and %SpO2 the CV was <5%. The exercise protocol did not elicit a training response when repeated 5 times during a 2-week period and the variability of exercise responses was low. We conclude that this protocol allows detection of small changes in cardiorespiratory responses to hypoxic exercise that might occur during exposure to hypoxia.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
MacNutt et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: