Why the study?
Does zofenopril plus ASA reduce the 1-year combined occurrence of death or hospitalization for cardiovascular causes compared to ramipril plus ASA in post-myocardial infarction patients with left ventricular dysfunction and arterial hypertension?
Does zofenopril plus ASA reduce the 1-year combined occurrence of death or hospitalization for cardiovascular causes compared to ramipril plus ASA in post-myocardial infarction patients with left ventricular dysfunction and arterial hypertension?
Zofenopril plus ASA is effective in preventing long-term cardiovascular outcomes in post-MI patients with LV dysfunction and arterial hypertension, particularly those with systolic BP ≥140 mmHg.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Should not yet alter ACE inhibitor selection post-MI; leaves open a potential zofenopril advantage in hypertensive subgroups for randomized confirmation.
Background: In the randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, multicenter, international SMILE-4 Study zofenopril (Z) 60 mg plus ASA was more effective than ramipril (R) 10 mg plus acetyl salicylic acid (ASA) 100 mg in reducing 1-year occurrence of major cardiovascular events in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by left ventricular dysfunction. Objective: To compare efficacy of Z and R plus ASA in patients with arterial hypertension from the SMILE-4 Study. Methods: The primary study end-point was 1-year combined occurrence of death or hospitalization for cardiovascular causes. Results: In the main study population (n = 716) the primary outcome was significantly reduced by Z vs. R (odds ratio, OR and 95% confidence interval, CI: 0.70, 0.51–0.96; p = 0.028). The majority of patients (437, 64.1%) had arterial hypertension and showed a rate of major cardiovascular events slightly, but not significantly, lower under Z than under R (32.1% vs. 39.5%; OR: 0.72, 0.49–1.07; p = 0.106). This was the case also for the group of patients without hypertension (24.1% Z vs. 32.3% R; OR: 0.67, 0.38–1.17; p = 0.156). However, in the group with an entry systolic blood pressure ≥140 mmHg the 1-year hazard of cardiovascular events was significantly (p = 0.003) lower under Z (28.9% vs. 43.9% R; OR: 0.52, 0.34–0.80). The reduction in the risk of cardiovascular events was similar in patients with and without hypertension. Conclusions: This retrospective analysis of the SMILE-4 Study confirmed the good efficacy of Z plus ASA in the prevention of long-term cardiovascular outcomes also in the subgroup of patients with arterial hypertension.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Borghi et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: