Key result
Stroke recovery studies require revised functional outcome measures to distinguish true recovery from compensation.
Novel therapeutic intervention that aims to enhance the endogenous recovery potential of the brain during the subacute phase of stroke has produced promising results. The paradigm shift in treatment approaches presents new challenges to preclinical and clinical researchers alike, especially in the functional endpoints domain. Shortcomings of the "neuroprotection" era of stroke research are yet to be fully addressed. Proportional recovery observed in clinics, and potentially in animal models, requires a thorough reevaluation of the methods used to assess recovery. To this end, this review aims to give a detailed evaluation of functional outcome measures used in clinics and preclinical studies. Impairments observed in clinics and animal models will be discussed from a functional testing perspective. Approaches needed to bridge the gap between clinical and preclinical research, along with potential means to measure the moving target recovery, will be discussed. Concepts such as true recovery of function and compensation and methods that are suitable for distinguishing the two are examined. Often-neglected outcomes of stroke, such as emotional disturbances, are discussed to draw attention to the need for further research in this area.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Balkaya et al. (2019) conducted a review in Stroke. Functional outcome measures in stroke recovery was evaluated. Functional outcome measures in clinical and preclinical stroke recovery studies require reevaluation to distinguish true functional recovery from compensation and address neglected outcomes.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: