Why the study?
Explanation of judgments made by deep learning models in ECG recognition systems is essential for clinical acceptance, but the effect of transfer learning on decision precision was unclear.
Does avoiding transfer learning improve explanation accuracy in deep learning-based ECG recognition systems?
Does avoiding transfer learning improve explanation accuracy in deep learning-based ECG recognition systems?
Transfer learning in ECG deep learning models may reduce clinical interpretability by focusing on non-diagnostic features, despite maintaining high accuracy.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Transfer learning may refine ECG CNN precision for interpretability; leaves open prospective validation before clinical use.
Electrocardiogram (ECG) recognition systems now play a leading role in the early detection of cardiovascular diseases. However, the explanation of judgments made by deep learning models in these systems is prominent for clinical acceptance. This article reveals the effect of transfer learning in ECG recognition systems on decision precision. This article investigated the role of transfer learning in ECG image classification using a customized convolutional neural network (CNN) with and without a VGG16 architecture. The customized CNN model with the VGG16 achieved a good test accuracy of 98.40%. Gradient-weighted class activation mapping (Grad-CAM), for this model, gave the wrong information because it focused on parts of the ECG that were not important for making decisions instead of features necessary for clinical diagnosis, like the P wave, QRS complex, and T wave. A proposed model that only used customized CNN layers and did not use transfer learning performed 99.08% on tests gave correct Grad-CAM explanations and correctly identified the influencing areas of decision-making in the ECG image. Because of these results, it seems that transfer learning might provide good performance metrics, but it might also make things harder to understand, which could make it harder for deep learning models that use ECG recognition to be reliable for diagnosis. This article concludes with a call for careful consideration when using transfer learning in the medical field, as model explanations resulting from such learning may not be appropriate when it comes to domain-specific interpretations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Khorsheed et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: