Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Regional analysts and policy makers have long struggled with problems arising from the uneven development of industrial systems. Most efforts have focused on manufacturing even though the business services sector continues to gain importance as a source of employment. This paper provides rigorous analyses of the regional organization of business services employment growth in the United States and discusses some implications of regionalism for the development of industrial policy. The analyses use chi‐square goodness‐of‐fit tests and spatial statistics to examine regional structure. State‐level employment data in ten business service industries for two periods, 1977–1982 and 1982–1987, are used in the analyses. The results show that although employment growth varies across the United States, it does not exhibit consistent regional organization. Instead, growth is organized more around metropolitan complexes. The lack of regional organization suggests that industrial policy should focus on the urban concentration of growth, telecommunications infrastructure and urban‐rural linkages.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Esparza et al. (1993) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: