Why the study?
Do short-stretch drop jumps improve stretch-shortening cycle efficiency compared to long-stretch drop jumps?
Do short-stretch drop jumps improve stretch-shortening cycle efficiency compared to long-stretch drop jumps?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Short-stretch drop jumps are more efficient for stretch-shortening cycle movements than long-stretch drop jumps, though EMG analysis results depend on the data-processing method used.
The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of different stretch amplitudes (angular displacements) on the performance and electromyographic (EMG) activity during drop jumps (DJs). The AMTI force platform, the Biovision electrical goniometer, and EMG system were used to record the ground reaction forces, knee angular displacement, and the EMG signals of the rectus femoris. The EMG data were treated by different data-processing methods: the biphase and triphase data-processing methods. The results revealed that the short-stretch DJs had a larger passive force, a higher eccentric end force, a higher concentric average force, and a faster eccentric angular velocity showing a more efficient stretch-shortening cycle (SSC) mechanism in using elastic energy and reactive properties than the long-stretch DJs. Therefore, the short-stretch DJs are recommended in training for the SSC movement. However, the results of biphase data-processing EMG method did not support this conclusion because there was no significant difference between long-stretch DJs and short-stretch DJs by using the biphase data-processing method, whereas the triphase method did support this conclusion and demonstrated that short-stretch DJs are more efficient.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lin et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: