A combination of options-pricing techniques and decision-analysis tools forms a practical process for evaluating R and D projects in a way that correctly values the impact of decision flexibility and the inevitable technical and commercial uncertainties. The options perspective leads to research-funding and project-selection decisions that can be radically different from those developed using the standard net-present-value financial rule. Decision-analysis tools simplify data acquisition. We applied the process at the Westinghouse Science and Technology Center using 13 embryonic research projects as a pilot test and subsequently applied it to the center's complete portfolio of research projects. Such an approach can be cost-effective for the type of scaled-down and decentralized research efforts that increasingly characterize US industry and can help research managers to optimize the level and composition of their research portfolios.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Perdue et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: