Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
INTRODUCTION: UACR is a marker of renal damage and renal disease progression risk; UACR reduction has been shown to correlate with renal protection. This post hoc analysis of pooled data from SUSTAIN 6 and LEADER investigated the effects of glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) analogues semaglutide and liraglutide vs placebo on UACR. METHODS: Primary outcome in both trials: major adverse cardiovascular events. Nephropathy events and change in renal biochemistry, including UACR, were secondary outcomes. In this analysis (N=11812), patients were stratified by baseline UACR class (normo-: <30 mg/g, micro-: 30–300 mg/g and macroalbuminuria: >300 mg/g). Risk of categorical changes in UACR (time to persistent: progression to micro- or macroalbuminuria, regression to micro- or normoalbuminuria, 30% reduction) and UACR change from baseline to 2 years were analysed by baseline UACR using a Cox regression model (with treatment as a fixed factor and stratified by study) and a mixed model on log-transformed values, respectively. RESULTS: GLP-1 analogues reduced risk of progression to micro- or macroalbuminuria and increased the likelihood of regression in albuminuria category vs placebo. The likelihood of reaching 30% UACR reduction was greater with the GLP-1 analogues vs placebo (p<0.0001 for all UACR subgroups) (Table). UACR increased relatively more from baseline to 2 years for placebo vs GLP-1 analogues for the pooled population and patients with baseline normo-, micro- and macroalbuminuria (24%, 20%, 30% and 21%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: This pooled analysis shows beneficial effects on UACR for GLP-1 analogues semaglutide and liraglutide vs placebo irrespective of baseline UACR.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Perkovic et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: