Two hundred and twenty-one hospitalized patients underwent serum determination of CA 19-9, a recently developed tumor marker assay, and CEA. Among these, 53 had a gastrointestinal (GI) cancer, 59 a GI benign disease, 52 a non-GI cancer, and 57 a non-GI benign disease. CA 19-9 assay was more accurate than CEA to detect malignancy, especially of GI source (69.8% sensitivity vs. 24.5% in GI patients); when a cutoff level of 41 ng/ml for CA 19-9 was considered, only 6 false-positive cases were found and both markers showed excellent specificity (94.9% for CEA and 89.9% for CA 19-9 in gastric, hepatobiliary and pancreatic cancer). We conclude that CA 19-9 is a useful GI tumor marker and it seems to be better than CEA in some pathologic situations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Civardi et al. (1986) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: