Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Some secondary or β relaxations in glass-forming materials involve molecular motions that bear strong resemblance to the primitive α relaxations of the coupling model, although the two are not identical. For these β relaxations, at the glass transition temperature Tg the relaxation time τβ(Tg) is expected to be shorter than but not too different in order of magnitude from τ0(Tg), the primitive α-relaxation time at Tg. The latter can be calculated by the coupling model from the relaxation time τα(Tg), the exponent (1−n) of the Kohlrausch–Williams–Watts (KWW) correlation function exp[−(t/τα)1−n], and the experimental crossover time, tc≈2 ps, of the α relaxation. From experimental data of β and α relaxations in a variety of glass-forming materials, it is found that τβ(Tg) and τ0(Tg) are close to each other in order of magnitude as anticipated. The results indicate these β relaxations indeed bear some close relation to the corresponding primitive α relaxation, although they are not the same process. Since the relaxation times of the majority of these β relaxations have the Arrhenius temperature dependence, τβ(T)=τβ∞ exp(Eβ/RT), where τβ∞ is of the order of 10−13–10−16 s, knowing, approximately, the value of τβ(T) at one temperature Tg means the location of the β relaxation in the relaxation map can be roughly determined from the α relaxation. The findings can be restated as the empirical result: there exists a strong correlation between the value of log[τβ(Tg)] and the KWW exponent (1−n) of the α relaxation in many glass-formers. A smaller KWW exponent of the α relaxation corresponds to shorter τβ(Tg) or smaller log[τβ(Tg)]. This remarkable cross correlation between the α relaxation and the β relaxation should be of interest for any model or theory of molecular dynamics of glass formers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
K. L. Ngai (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: