Neutralization theory was examined as it related to drinking behavior among a sample of 2,424 university students. Neutralization was conceptualized as part of a continuum of responses beginning with the moral principle “drinking is wrong,” through a situational exception to the moral principle, and then to neutralizations of drinking behavior through denying responsibility, denying injury, denying a victim, condemning condemners, and appealing to higher loyalties. Findings supported the application of neutralization theory to drinking behavior only for a small percentage of drinkers: 17.4% of the total sample and 9.4% of those who drink accept the moral principle but made exceptions to it. Possible explanations for variations in reports of problem drinking are discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dodder et al. (1993) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: